|
Post by rakib1 on Feb 14, 2024 23:55:54 GMT -5
And this just coincides with the launch period of the smart campaign. Dynamic Remarketing Traffic Comparison Dynamic Remarketing Traffic Comparison Traffic from dynamic remarketing moved to a smart campaign, and the revenue it generated fell by 86%. It turns out that smart trading has partially replaced dynamic remarketing. Dynamic Remarketing Revenue Comparison Dynamic Remarketing Revenue Comparison We concluded: to fully evaluate the results of a smart shopping campaign, you need to take into account changes in dynamic remarketing. It turns out that at almost the same cost we received more traffic, but not USA Phone Number List income. And the ROAS ratio fell from 1223% to 1206%. The change is insignificant, but still this is not growth, you will agree. Dynamics of revenue from shopping campaigns with dynamic remarketing Dynamics of revenue from shopping campaigns with dynamic remarketing conclusions If you've never used a smart shopping campaign before and are deciding between smart and regular, choose smart. It saves the advertiser's time quite well. A regular shopping campaign shouldn’t be written off either. If you set it up correctly, focusing on rational spending of funds and generating income, then together with dynamic remarketing, it will give results no worse. Of course, this even sounds difficult. But if you already have this tandem, then think twice before changing it to a new model and wasting time on learning a smart campaign. How to conduct a practical seminar for entrepreneurs and marketers: our successes, lessons and conclusions Share: 4 minutes master class on creating a chatbot chatbot seminar
|
|